当前位置:循环首页>正文

[GWICC2010]ACS合并多支病变患者PCI vs CABG疗效对比——Aaron Kugelmass教授专访

作者:国际循环网   日期:2010/10/19 13:51:19

国际循环网版权所有,谢绝任何形式转载,侵犯版权者必予法律追究。

本次大会上你的讲题是“ACS合并多支病变患者PCI vs CABG疗效对比”,根据您的经验,您更趋向于哪种方法进行血运重建?原因是什么?


    <International Circulation>:  In China economic considerations must be analysed carefully such as the number of stents needed before a procedure can take place. What is your opinion on this?
    Dr Aaron Kugelmass: This also applies to the U.S as well, we have to think about how many stents we have to use and whether we should use multiple drug-eluting stents. In the United States the hospital costs are normally covered by either the government or by private insurance but the cost of the clopidogrel and the prasugrel which is very expensive is not and when patients cannot afford their medicine they stop taking their drugs leading to stent thrombosis. So, from the patient’s perspective even if the stents cost less money overall it is actually more expensive for the patient getting the stent than the bypass.  We in the U.S have to take into consideration both the overall cost to society but also the cost to the individual patient.

  《国际循环》:在中国,操作前需要仔细考虑经济因素,比如需要放几个支架?您怎么看这个问题?
    Kugelmass教授:在美国也是如此。我们也得考虑放几个支架。思考到底需不需要放置多个药物洗脱支架。在美国,医疗费用通常由美国政府或私人保险机构支付。但是,氯吡格雷和普拉格雷的费用不在支付范围内,这两个药都非常贵。当患者买不起药时,就没法继续吃药,进而导致支架内血栓的发生。因此,从患者的角度来考虑的话,尽管支架本身花费少,但是从总体上来讲,置入支架的花费要高于CABG。在美国,我们不但要考虑到治疗给社会带来的总体花费,还要考虑到每位患者的花费。

上一页  [1]  [2]  [3]  下一页

版面编辑:赵书芳  责任编辑:张衡



ACSPCI vs CABGAaron Kugelmass教授

分享到: 更多


设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 关于我们 | 联系方式 | 招贤纳士
声明:国际循环网( www.icirculation.com)对刊载的所有文章、视频、幻灯、音频等资源拥有全部版权。未经本站许可,不得转载。
京ICP备15014970号-5  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号(京)-非经营性-2017-0063  京公网安备 11010502033353号  增值电信业务经营许可证:京ICP证150541号
国际循环 版权所有   © 2004-2024 www.icirculation.com All Rights Reserved
公司名称:北京美赞广告有限公司 公司地址:北京市朝阳区朝阳门北大街乙12号天辰大厦1座1409 电话:010-51295530